Organization options available include color-labels, ratings, captions, and categories.
However, results vary for different camera model. After testing with several images, ACDSee though performed well in converting raw camera files, both Capture One and Lightroom still performed better, with the latter revealing more natural lighting and color with well-exposed images, and the former revealing the most detail. For instance, it doesn’t support the Canon EOS R.Īnother issue is its raw file conversion or import quality. For new cameras, the support updates regularly, though compared to some competitors, these updates are slower.
Acdsee photo editor vs acdsee pro professional#
ACDSee Professional supports the raw camera formats from well-known professional and prosumer models. It is easier to see your last import with Lightroom. You can open photos, music, and videos through ACDSee Professional, but I would have preferred the app to display just photos in Manage view. The ACDSee Photo Studio Professional, unlike Lightroom, doesn’t need you to import files, you only need to open a photo file anywhere and then it will be included in the database of the app. However, you cannot apply adjustment presets and generally, the import is not as robust compared to that offered by PhotoDirector and Lightroom. You may decide to change the name of the files on import and to add metadata, like keywords. As expected, importing takes place in the Manage mode.
0 kommentar(er)
